
A little perspective
Really makes you think.
Chris Gethard will be on HuffPost Live this afternoon to talk about using comedy as therapy. Last week, he reached out on Tumblr to an anonymous, suicidal fan to talk about his own battles with depression, and it was a damn beautiful thing full of humanity and generosity.
He’ll be joined via webcam by comedian/writer Gabe Delahaye of the blog Videogum, as well as a professor of comedy rhetoric from Texas A&M and a fan or two.
Tune in today at 1:20 p.m. EST.
Wow. I just read the post linked up there, and it is a thing of raw, emotional beauty that deserves to be shared, especially with anyone feeling fragile, disconnected or hopeless. Pass it on.
I honestly do not know when I have enjoyed a simple plate of bacon and potatoes more. And that is seriously saying something, because I’m pretty much a professional enjoyer of both.
jomc:
A harrowing, historic week in Egypt - The Big Picture - Boston.com
empty shotgun shells
| — | If Your Life Were a Movie - NYTimes.com (via jaybushman) I find this relevant to my interests and future projects… (via spytap) Fascinating article. |
I have no idea what’s going on here, but I approve.
I approve with a fucking VENGEANCE.
My dreams will be haunted.
The glittering jewel in the internet’s crown.
Here an orchestra plays John Cage “4’33”, where none of the performers actually perform. Anything. Complete silence.
If there is an Idiocracy II: Electric Boogaloo, it should start with this sequence.
| — | Milan Kundera on the scene at the Battle of Borodino in Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace. The point is simple, but worth remembering: what we think catalyzes our thoughts and actions rarely does; it is some slyly incidental detail -unnoticed or immediately forgotten, in all likelihood- which provokes us, prompts this or that momentous decision. We falsify our lives; we become bad fiction, bad television. We believe that what drives us is what drives the mannequins we watch: pop-psychology stories, idiotically-abused words like “closure” and “acting out” and “repressing,” the silly character-arcs that make everything seem purposeful and meaningful, the new diagnoses, the explanations which flatter us, the academic memes. In War and Peace, what propels Tolstoy’s grand characters -they live largely atop the world, on the historical stage- may be trivial, but it tends at least to be poetic or quasi-heroic: Andrei’s tenderly narcissistic memories (in a field hospital full of moaning, butchered men!), Pierre’s ludicrous numerological pretenses to messianic importance. In our lives, we are more likely to misread the grotesque, sublimated code described by Gombrowicz, insisting that we’ve chosen what has in fact been coerced by the similarly-unwilled behavior of others: we talk of “decisions” while locked in double-helizes of paired-reactions, unable to escape, determined by others who are determined by others. (This is to say nothing of propaganda and advertising, the archetypical view of which is that they do not affect us in our deliberative thinking and decisions while we accept that they affect almost all others. We are fooled! We believe in our own illusory agency! We fall for our our pretexts and rationalizations!). Or perhaps not. At any rate: isn’t one of the most attractive ideas of psychotherapy that someone will “read” our life and explain themes not evident to us? What about you? Do you read your life (or your novels) inattentively and badly? (I do). Is your biography based on a template? From where have you borrowed your explanations? What have you forgotten? (via mills) |
This was a couple of days ago here, and it was pretty gorgeous. Amazing when all you see on Twitter and Facebook for a couple of minutes is one word and a lot of exclamation points.
“No, I don’t mind if it sleeps in my room smiling all night! Is this smiling! Can it see me! How do I know when it’s looking at me! Does it sit down ever! So it does not have a neck then! I love staying over at your place, thanks for having me!”
(via heyvancouver)
DUDE I KNOW MY MIND IS BLOWN TOO.